Instagram AmazingRibs Facebook AmazingRibs X - Meathead Pinterest AmazingRibs Youtube AmazingRibs

Welcome!


This is a membership forum. Guests can view 5 pages for free. To participate, please join.

[ Pitmaster Club Information | Join Now | 30 Day Trial | Login | Contact Us ]

Only 4 free page views remaining.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

275

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    275

    I've been smoking chuckies at 225* but decided to try one at 275*. When we cook a pot roast in the oven it's at 325* and about 3 hours makes a fall apart roast, so I figured 275* should be easy and quicker than 225*. It worked great, but I didn't get a smoke ring, ( straight from the fridge to the kettle + SnS). That's no biggie, but is that odd.
    Since it didn't happen without a photo, here's your blanking photo...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A07Y6423.jpg
Views:	193
Size:	214.8 KB
ID:	201544

    #2
    photo-shopped.

    Comment


      #3
      I put my meat and wood on my kettle and SnS when it's heating up/passing 175 and get a better smoke ring vs waiting until its up to ~225.

      Comment


        #4
        That looks delicious. I am personally a fan of the 275* temp range for a lot of stuff... That is where my stick burner and my PBC both seem comfortable and I think it works out just fine.

        Comment


        • RonB
          RonB commented
          Editing a comment
          Thanx Nate.

        #5
        I really like the 250-275 range for pork butt and chuck roast ..... Seems like the sweet spot, to me. Doesn't stall as bad, but cooks slow enough to really attack the collagen and fat and break it down nicely. I don't worry a whole lot about smoke ring.

        Comment


          #6
          I like 250-275 to get things moving along. But man oh man, a nice looooooooong 225 cook with the Slow 'n Sear on a brisket, or running 225-235 in the Pit Barrel for 14-15 hours with multiple briskets, turns out some sweet beef.

          Comment


            #7
            Originally posted by Jerod Broussard View Post
            I like 250-275 to get things moving along. But man oh man, a nice looooooooong 225 cook with the Slow 'n Sear on a brisket, or running 225-235 in the Pit Barrel for 14-15 hours with multiple briskets, turns out some sweet beef.
            Brisket and ribs of any sort go on at 225-235. I was more thinking about things like pork butt and chuck roast ... Lots of fat and collagen to be broken down. They seem to cook really well, in my experience, in the 250-275 range. :-)

            Comment


            • Jerod Broussard
              Jerod Broussard commented
              Editing a comment
              "Lots of fat and collagen to be broken down"

              you should see some of the briskets I have to cook.

            #8
            I see a bit of a smoke ring...

            Sure looks tasty, RonB .

            Kathryn

            Comment


              #9
              Since smoke ring and taste are not connected, don't worry about the smoke ring.

              OKAY, yes I do.

              I put my cold protein on at about 180-190, depending on how heavy the smoke is. Then run 200-220 for a while before going 225-250. The smoke ring, as I understand, happens early in the cook.

              Nonetheless, sometimes I don't get a smoke ring, or not much of one. Happens.

              Your cook looks GREAT, RonB !

              Hope it tasted as good as it looks!

              Comment


                #10
                richinlbrg that's what I've started doing and had great results on my last ribs and butt.

                Comment


                  #11
                  Looks mighty fine!

                  Comment


                  • RonB
                    RonB commented
                    Editing a comment
                    Thanx Huskee.

                  #12
                  Originally posted by richinlbrg View Post
                  Since smoke ring and taste are not connected, don't worry about the smoke ring.

                  OKAY, yes I do.

                  I put my cold protein on at about 180-190, depending on how heavy the smoke is. Then run 200-220 for a while before going 225-250. The smoke ring, as I understand, happens early in the cook.

                  Nonetheless, sometimes I don't get a smoke ring, or not much of one. Happens.

                  Your cook looks GREAT, RonB !

                  Hope it tasted as good as it looks!

                  Thanx richinlbrg - I'm not worried about taste, but I am curious about the lack of smoke ring. It's my understanding that the chemical reaction that causes the smoke ring stops once the meat reaches a certain temp. So putting cold meat in a cool smoker should increase the chances of a nice smoke ring.

                  Comment


                    #13
                    Originally posted by RonB View Post
                    Thanx richinlbrg - I'm not worried about taste, but I am curious about the lack of smoke ring. It's my understanding that the chemical reaction that causes the smoke ring stops once the meat reaches a certain temp. So putting cold meat in a cool smoker should increase the chances of a nice smoke ring.
                    Yes. Try what he & Fuzzydaddy do, put the meat on while the kettle is heating up. I think the meat temp is about 170 where the pink myoglobin lock stops. The more combustion gases that reach the meat before it heats up to ~170 the deeper the ring will be, in theory. Eventually the heat wins of course, but we can play with things to alter the level in many cases. The more combustion you have, the higher the temperature of the fire (but not the air), and the colder the meat, and the lower the initial cooking temp, the deeper the ring will be. Cooker type, fuel type, fire temperature, humidity all play a part. I get deeper smoke rings on a stickburner than a kettle with charcoal & wood when the air temp is the same. Why? I'm no scientist but I suspect the higher oxygen burn in an all log fire carries more of the good stuff to the meat. I struggle to get a 1/4" smoke ring on the kettle, sometimes a pinch less. The obvious difference between the two is high oxygen fire vs low oxygen fire to achieve the same cooking temp.

                    Comment


                    • KARB2014
                      KARB2014 commented
                      Editing a comment
                      I have been having the exact opposite happen to me. In the kettle with the SnS I get a much deeper pronounced ring than I get with the KBQ.

                    • smokinfatties
                      smokinfatties commented
                      Editing a comment
                      I too haven't gotten a very pronounced smoke ring on the KBQ as compared to other stuff (SnS/ WSM), but I think it's because the KBQ cooks so fast!

                    #14
                    RonB , Huskee , I posted pics in the show us what you're cooking thread. I cooked a port butt and shoulder yesterday, and did it just like I said. 39*F meat put on the SnS'd kettle at about 185*F. Ran around 190-200 for a couple hours, and never over 225*F through the 6+ hours, and had no discernible smoke ring.

                    Smh

                    Comment


                    • Huskee
                      Huskee commented
                      Editing a comment
                      The smoke ring can be an elusive mistress....

                    #15
                    Hh th j

                    Comment

                  Announcement

                  Collapse
                  No announcement yet.
                  Working...
                  X
                  false
                  0
                  Guest
                  Guest
                  500
                  ["membership","help","nojs","maintenance","shop","reset-password","authaau-alpha","ebooklogin-start","alpha","start"]
                  false
                  false
                  Yes
                  ["\/forum\/free-deep-dive-guide-ebook-downloads","\/forum\/free-deep-dive-guide-ebook-downloads\/1157845-paid-members-download-your-6-deep-dive-guide-ebooks-for-free-here","\/forum\/the-pitcast","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/bbq-news-magazine-2019-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/bbq-news-magazine-2020-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/bbq-news-magazine-2021-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/bbq-news-magazine-2022-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/current-2023-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/current-2024-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/current-2025-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/current-2026-issues","\/forum\/bbq-stars","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/tuffy-stone","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/meathead","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/harry-soo","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/matt-pittman","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/kent-rollins","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/dean-fearing","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/tim-grandinetti","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/kent-phillips-brett-gallaway","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/david-bouska","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/ariane-daguin","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/jack-arnold","\/forum\/free-deep-dive-guide-ebook-downloads"]
                  /forum/free-deep-dive-guide-ebook-downloads