Instagram AmazingRibs Facebook AmazingRibs X - Meathead Pinterest AmazingRibs Youtube AmazingRibs

Welcome!


This is a membership forum. Guests can view 5 pages for free. To participate, please join.

[ Pitmaster Club Information | Join Now | 30 Day Trial | Login | Contact Us ]

Only 4 free page views remaining.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2-zone pork tenderloin: front or reverse sear?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    2-zone pork tenderloin: front or reverse sear?

    I have a couple of tenderloins I'm going to cook on the SnS kettle via 2-zone for dinner tonight. I've seen posts here and elsewhere that do this, and some do a front sear, 60-90 sec per side, then indirect until IT of 140-145, others the other way around, indirect to the high 130s then sear it off at the end.

    Pros and cons? Kibbitzing welcome.

    #2
    At those temps I'm guessing you're talking pork not beef. Personally I'd do it front sear so that I'd get the amount of crust I want first then move to finish interior since pork is so unforgiving about dryness if you overshoot by just a few degrees. IMO rear sear involves some level of guessing on how much temp increase during sear and then carryover.

    Comment


    • DaveD
      DaveD commented
      Editing a comment
      I assumed that because this thread is in "Pork discussion" that it would be obvious, but I'll add it to the OP. Thanks for the input!

    • Uncle Bob
      Uncle Bob commented
      Editing a comment
      Sorry, I rarely read past the title before deciding whether to read a thread or not.

    #3
    +1 to what Uncle Bob said. I front sear to avoid over cooking.

    Comment


    • Purc
      Purc commented
      Editing a comment
      +3 to the above comments of front searing pork

    • bbqLuv
      bbqLuv commented
      Editing a comment
      Monitor temp and to not overcook.

    #4
    I just opened up the package, and it turns out that the two pieces are radically different shape/size:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20251113_083615.jpg
Views:	205
Size:	1.71 MB
ID:	1788279

    The smaller one is super thin on the pointy end, very challenging to cook on high heat, so I'm going to sous vide that one and sear it quickly. I might cut the other one in half to have two kinds of seasoning, with one being the same as the SV piece. That step will allow a comparison of the same seasoning but different process, and if I cut the big piece in half, I'll be able to test different seasonings on the same process. My experimentalist heart is naturally attracted to that...

    Comment


    • Uncle Bob
      Uncle Bob commented
      Editing a comment
      I've had good results folding the thin end back toward the thick end enough to even out the diameter of the total. A couple pieces of twine and you're good to go.

    • DaveD
      DaveD commented
      Editing a comment
      That's a great idea!

    #5
    I do the same as Uncle Bob, season the skinny part and fold it back.

    I use 4 to 6 inch turkey trussing pins for small skewering jobs like this.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	51JlLTy3PEL._AC_SL1280_.jpg Views:	0 Size:	63.8 KB ID:	1788316

    I also use these pins to indicate the direction of the grain in a brisket or tri tip, poking them in before applying the final rub and smoking.

    They're nice because they don't char or break when trying to remove them like toothpicks do.

    And P.S., you did a good job getting rid of that silverskin. It can be a real pain to remove sometimes, for me at least.

    Kathryn

    Comment


    • DaveD
      DaveD commented
      Editing a comment
      Thanks, but I can't take credit. They were like this right out of the package.

    • Bkhuna
      Bkhuna commented
      Editing a comment
      fzxdoc You don't show up enough but when you do I always learn something new. I have sever selections of skewers but never put 2+2 together. Thank you.

    • fzxdoc
      fzxdoc commented
      Editing a comment
      Panhead John, the ones I use are 4 inches long as well. It's a good size for my needs.

      K.

    #6
    I butterfly and make medallions, as Chef Tom does here. Then I reverse sear.



    Comment


      #7
      I almost always cook ones that have been marinated... either in the package or by me.
      I like to do a reverse sear. Especially if the marinade is a sweet one.
      I cook mine to an IT of 150 before pulling and resting. Removes all of the pink, but still plenty juicy.

      Comment


      • DaveD
        DaveD commented
        Editing a comment
        Gotcha. I did a marinaded one last time, so this time around it's dry rubs.

      #8
      Reverse sear is my way with a big Apple fire, or a really hot cast iron in the house, but it’s hard to imagine messing up a pork temderloin my only bit is consider carry over when you pull it off to build your sear fire.

      Comment


      • DaveD
        DaveD commented
        Editing a comment
        Ostensibly the fire would be plenty hot already, on the hot side. In my experience, the hot side becomes sear-ready within just a minute or two, so once the IT is there I can just lift the lid and wait til it's G2G.

      • Richard Chrz
        Richard Chrz commented
        Editing a comment
        I find pulling it a bit and letting momentum stop or slow down on carry over, allows me more sear time. Something to consider maybe,

      #9
      IT at 140*F max for me or I seem to over cook them.
      I "reverse sear", as it were, in my Traeger.
      It seems when meat is cold and damp, they take on smoke flavor.
      therefore, smoke first and then turn up the heat,

      This is on a pellet grill, I never done this over charcoal, but you can getter done'
      Don't forget pictures.



      Traegerized a pork tenderloin
      seasoned with Traeger Pork and Poultry rub.
      1 hour at 225*F with super smoke
      set temperature to 375*F
      Done at 140*F internal.
      Did not overcook this time.
      Maybe should have rested a little longer.

      Click image for larger version  Name:	image0 (98).jpg Views:	90 Size:	39.4 KB ID:	1786159


      Show Us What You're Cooking! (SUWYC) - Volume 39, Fall 2025 - Pitmaster Club​​

      Comment


        #10
        Just for chips and giggles, I asked MS Copilot about it, and this is what I got back.

        When you sear raw, you're fighting surface moisture that hasn't migrated yet, so it takes longer to get past evaporation into actual browning. Plus raw proteins contract more violently, potentially squeezing out juices right at the surface.

        With reverse sear, the surface has already dried during the indirect phase, proteins are partially denatured, and there's less moisture blocking the Maillard reaction—so you get faster, deeper browning with less gray band underneath. The trade-off: sear-first gives you that crust locked in early (some argue it adds flavor to the indirect phase), while reverse-sear risks overcooking if you're not precise with your timing.

        With tenderloin specifically, you're dealing with such a lean, delicate cut that the thermal history matters even more than with fattier cuts. The traditional sear-first method came from restaurant kitchens needing speed and workflow efficiency, not necessarily optimal results. Home cooks with good zone control (like your SnS setup) can exploit the science better: let the proteins relax and surface moisture migrate during the indirect phase, then hit them with concentrated heat when they're primed for rapid Maillard development.
        Is it on any kind of right track there? It sure sounds plausible. I have wondered this for some time.

        Comment


        • fzxdoc
          fzxdoc commented
          Editing a comment
          It sounds like Copilot snooped into Dr. Blonder's or Chris Young's site for that info.

        #11
        Copilot makes some sense in this case.

        However, I will preface by saying that after years of doing the reverse sear, I am in camp front sear lately, as I have found I am much less likely to overcook things.

        And either way, fold that skinny bit back to make a more uniform shape as others suggested. Otherwise, it will be way way overdone even if just cooked indirect, without a sear.

        Anyway, back to reverse sear. If you go that route, I would pull the protein at 120, then let it COOL for a bit before doing the sear. The trick is that the pork will still have a bit of carry over cooking no matter when you pull it, and if you cook it past 140, this tenderloin is gonna be dried out. You may want to only sear until you have an IT of 135 in fact, due to carry over.

        You're a PITMASTER. You got this!

        Comment


        • WI Bubba
          WI Bubba commented
          Editing a comment
          ^ What he said.

        • DaveD
          DaveD commented
          Editing a comment
          Aw, thanks Jim! I will absolutely tie back that flap as suggested. Don't know why that didn't occur to me. I may try to get fancy and do one of each on the same load of coals as an experiment. I did that once before on a pair of strip steaks. It's a juggling act for sure... we'll see...

        #12
        I'm a reverse sear guy, pull about 135 and crank up the fire and sear. These always come out good. I always cook 2 together, tied them head to tail so I get a uniform shape. The picture is 4 tenderloins, tied 2 together. Cooked on a PK 360.

        I don't have any sliced up pics, as we took these to a dinner we did for some of our local unhoused group.

        Here's a recipe for the plum sauce that we used, it's good.

        Ingredients
        • 1-13 oz. jar red plum preserves. We like the Bonne Maman brand
        • 2 Tbl. butter
        • 1 small onion diced
        • 1/2 cup brown sugar
        • 1/3 cup chili sauce
        • ¼ cup soy sauce
        • 2 TBL. lemon juice
        • 2 tsp dry mustard
        • 3 drops of hot sauce

        Directions

        Sauté onion in butter until clear, 4-5 minutes
        Mix plum preserves and all ingredients together, add to the onion, cook over medium heat, uncovered for 15 minutes, stirring often.
        It will thicken and become a beautiful red color


        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1294.jpg
Views:	166
Size:	104.9 KB
ID:	1788755

        Click image for larger version

Name:	Image.jpg
Views:	155
Size:	4.43 MB
ID:	1788756

        Comment


        • fzxdoc
          fzxdoc commented
          Editing a comment
          That sauce sounds fanatastic. Thanks a bunch!

          K.

        • wrgilb
          wrgilb commented
          Editing a comment
          fzxdoc I could literally just drink the sauce, it's that good. We'll usually have mashed potatoes with the pork and I end up putting the sauce all over them.

        #13
        Reverse sear. Always reverse sear IMO.

        Comment


          #14
          I’m a BIG fan of the reverse sear, and tell all my non grilling friends about it. However, for a small/thin cut like this I tend to do the front sear, as the browning can take more time (relatively speaking, in proportion to the total cook time), and this way it helps avoid overcooking. Just my thoughts.

          Comment


            #15
            Hey folks, here are the deliverables for this experiment. I managed to test two things at the same time: 1) One tenderloin cleft in twain, same seasoning on both pieces, one cooked front sear, the other reverse sear. 2) Two pieces, both reverse seared, but with different seasonings.

            We keep a supply of those little skewers fzxdoc Kathryn wrote about above, so I used a few to regularize the shape of that smaller piece. I cut the larger in half, and both of those got Jenni In A Bottle rub, and the smaller piece got just salt, pepper, garlic powder (at lower right below).

            Click image for larger version  Name:	20251114_164256.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.68 MB ID:	1789023

            I ran half a chimney of B&B coals, and had another half chimney of lump ready to light if need be, but that turned out not to be necessary, the B&B handled it all like a champ. First step was to sear one half of the larger cut, 90 seconds per "side", given that the things are a little bit squared off. Then over to the indirect side with the other two.

            Click image for larger version  Name:	20251114_170924.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.66 MB ID:	1789024
            Click image for larger version  Name:	20251114_171532.jpg Views:	0 Size:	2.10 MB ID:	1789027

            Turns out the front seared piece reached almost 125/52 just from the searing step, so it came off fifteen minutes later at 145/63. I let it sit in this dish covered in foil right on the kettle shelf for about ten minutes to pump the brakes on carryover, then stuck it in the oven in the kitchen at its lowest setting of 170/77 while the other two pieces finished cooking.

            Click image for larger version  Name:	20251114_173409.jpg Views:	0 Size:	2.17 MB ID:	1789029

            Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the rev sear pieces did their thing. SPG on the left, JIAB on the right.
            Click image for larger version  Name:	20251114_174930.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.76 MB ID:	1789025
            Then seared after pulling them in the high 130s/just under 60.
            Click image for larger version  Name:	20251114_181204.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.85 MB ID:	1789026

            Only the rev seared JIAB piece overshot, reaching 152/67, but the other two pieces did not exceed 145/63. Note the front-seared piece was kept above 130/54 while in the holding oven. Left to right: SPG, JIAB rev sear, JIAB front sear.
            Click image for larger version  Name:	20251114_181624.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.15 MB ID:	1789019
            Click image for larger version  Name:	20251114_181634.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.11 MB ID:	1789020
            Click image for larger version  Name:	20251114_181645.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.33 MB ID:	1789021

            All three pieces were juicy as all getout when slicing. Same order as above.
            Click image for larger version  Name:	20251114_182128.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.87 MB ID:	1789028

            Plated with jasmine rice and green beans. Now L to R it's the rev sear SPG piece, rev sear JIAB, front sear JIAB.
            Click image for larger version  Name:	20251114_182335.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.64 MB ID:	1789022

            Both my lovely bride and I had a hard time telling these apart, aside from the seasonings. I expected the piece that hit the higher temp to be significantly drier, but it really wasn't. It was noticeable, but very slight. All three were absolutely tender and delicious.

            I could just detect a slight difference in bite between the rev seared and front seared pieces. The front-seared crust seemed thinner and had some strength to it, meaning I could feel it being bitten through. The rev seared pieces seemed to lack that feature - and we're talking about a *very* subtle difference. I doubt I would have picked it up if I hadn't been looking for a difference, given the test that was afoot.

            The one thing I find advantageous about doing rev sear for this cut on a charcoal cooker is this. In a front sear, you have to get the kettle temp back down for the indirect step after searing, and that takes time, potentially complicating the cook depending on what else you have on the menu. That was a challenge last night, along with the front-seared piece having a much higher IT after the sear than I'd anticipated.

            On the other hand, in rev sear, you don't care. Complete the indirect step, take the lid off and open the vents, sear, walk away for the night. Given how trivial the differences were here, next time I do this cut on the kettle, I'll reverse sear for sure.

            Thanks for following along on my navel-gazing adventure!

            Comment


            • wrgilb
              wrgilb commented
              Editing a comment
              That picture is just begging for the plum sauce recipe I posted above.

            • DaveD
              DaveD commented
              Editing a comment
              wrgilb I didn't see that post until after I'd finished the cook - it does look delicious!! Will try it next time.

            • Ace
              Ace commented
              Editing a comment
              Perfection... :-)

          Announcement

          Collapse
          No announcement yet.
          Working...
          X
          false
          0
          Guest
          Guest
          500
          ["membership","help","nojs","maintenance","shop","reset-password","authaau-alpha","ebooklogin-start","alpha","start"]
          false
          false
          Yes
          ["\/forum\/free-deep-dive-guide-ebook-downloads","\/forum\/free-deep-dive-guide-ebook-downloads\/1157845-paid-members-download-your-6-deep-dive-guide-ebooks-for-free-here","\/forum\/the-pitcast","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/bbq-news-magazine-2019-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/bbq-news-magazine-2020-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/bbq-news-magazine-2021-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/bbq-news-magazine-2022-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/current-2023-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/current-2024-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/current-2025-issues","\/forum\/national-barbecue-news-magazine\/national-barbecue-news-magazine-aa\/current-2026-issues","\/forum\/bbq-stars","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/tuffy-stone","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/meathead","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/harry-soo","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/matt-pittman","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/kent-rollins","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/dean-fearing","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/tim-grandinetti","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/kent-phillips-brett-gallaway","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/david-bouska","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/ariane-daguin","\/forum\/bbq-stars\/jack-arnold","\/forum\/free-deep-dive-guide-ebook-downloads"]
          /forum/free-deep-dive-guide-ebook-downloads