Howdy all.
In the old days, all I knew was how to forward sear.
Then I heard/read about the reverse sear, and thought it was the best thing since sliced bread (or, at least, searing stations). I would cook a steak till about 95F internal, then sear. I have had very good results with this, but wondered...since you are cooking the food most of the way first, then searing it, you have a very limited "window of opportunity" to get it right. Temps raise quickly and your food can overcook in an instant. I was good at handling that, but then it dawned on me, you have limited the amount of sear you can enjoy by doing it last.
On my next cook, I seared the (you-know-what) out of the steak until it was utterly perfect, then finished it on "low" for a perfect inside temp. To me, that was far superior to any reverse sear.
So, am I missing something here about the benefits of the reverse sear?
In the old days, all I knew was how to forward sear.
Then I heard/read about the reverse sear, and thought it was the best thing since sliced bread (or, at least, searing stations). I would cook a steak till about 95F internal, then sear. I have had very good results with this, but wondered...since you are cooking the food most of the way first, then searing it, you have a very limited "window of opportunity" to get it right. Temps raise quickly and your food can overcook in an instant. I was good at handling that, but then it dawned on me, you have limited the amount of sear you can enjoy by doing it last.
On my next cook, I seared the (you-know-what) out of the steak until it was utterly perfect, then finished it on "low" for a perfect inside temp. To me, that was far superior to any reverse sear.
So, am I missing something here about the benefits of the reverse sear?







), with a front sear.
Comment