Have an opinion question for those on the board that own both a PBC and a WSC / WSK. As background, I currently have both of these cookers but my PBC is beginning to rust out in the bottom center and I’ll soon be faced with the decision as to whether or not to replace it, or perhaps replace it with something else (I can hear the chorus now, OJB! OJB!
). I rarely have the need to cook at any kind of volume so my question is strictly targeted toward the taste of the food produced, and it is this: Are there certain cooks / foods for which you definitely prefer to use your PBC over the WSC/WSK based solely on the taste of the food, and if so, what are they? My PBC makes awesome stuff, and my WSC makes awesome stuff, but over the time that I’ve owned them both I’ve tended to make certain things on one (for example, chickens on the PBC) and different things on the other (i.e., pork butts on the WSC, in kamado mode). Before making the decision as to whether or not to replace the PBC, I’m hoping to draw upon the expertise of the board to help me determine whether I really need to do that or not. Thanks for your help in advance!
). I rarely have the need to cook at any kind of volume so my question is strictly targeted toward the taste of the food produced, and it is this: Are there certain cooks / foods for which you definitely prefer to use your PBC over the WSC/WSK based solely on the taste of the food, and if so, what are they? My PBC makes awesome stuff, and my WSC makes awesome stuff, but over the time that I’ve owned them both I’ve tended to make certain things on one (for example, chickens on the PBC) and different things on the other (i.e., pork butts on the WSC, in kamado mode). Before making the decision as to whether or not to replace the PBC, I’m hoping to draw upon the expertise of the board to help me determine whether I really need to do that or not. Thanks for your help in advance!









Comment