I currently have a weber 22.5". I've cooked st. Louis ribs twice 3 times and brisket once. The ribs got progressively better although they came out chewier and tougher than I expected. The brisket was really good although the flat was slightly tough. I followed the recipes from Meathead's book.
I have a maverick et-733 thermometer and I had kept the temperature mostly between 210 and 250 for the ribs and between 212 and 275 for the brisket although it did spike to 300 once and took about 15 minutes to get back down.
I aimed for 225 for both rib and brisket cooks.
i was wondering if the ribs and the brisket flat came out a bit tougher than I expected because of the radiant heat coming from the charcoals piled to the side. I didnt have any barrier like a slow n sear.
Have y'all tried cooking with a slow n sear and without on the kettle and are the results significant?
​​​​​​Also I noticed I was babysitting the grill a lot. On those longer cooks, especially on brisket, I was hoping the temperature would settle a bit more instead of having to adjust the vents all the time.
Would a slow n sear keep a much more stable temperature than charcoal piled to one side? I had unlit charcoal in a pile then poured about half a lit chimney of charcoal on top. I used lump charcoal.
Or would having briquettes steady the temperature a lot more than lump?
Finally, I was wondering if I should get a pit barrel cooker instead because it seems to get really good results with no baby sitting.
How would y'all compare the meat results from a weber kettle slow n sear with a pbc?
I know that pbc cooks at a higher temp and I would think it would lead to tougher meat than a kettle at around 225, but I've never tried a pbc. The testimonials in the pbc have all been good and the se for slow n sear so I have no idea which would be better for me.
I would like good tasting food and minimal vent adjusting, whether it be from stable temperature on the sns or set it and forget it from pbc.
For those of you who have tried the pbc, slow n sear, and weber kettle without slow n sear, what do you make of this or recommend?
There seem to be so many good options that I'm a bit paralyzed.
I have a maverick et-733 thermometer and I had kept the temperature mostly between 210 and 250 for the ribs and between 212 and 275 for the brisket although it did spike to 300 once and took about 15 minutes to get back down.
I aimed for 225 for both rib and brisket cooks.
i was wondering if the ribs and the brisket flat came out a bit tougher than I expected because of the radiant heat coming from the charcoals piled to the side. I didnt have any barrier like a slow n sear.
Have y'all tried cooking with a slow n sear and without on the kettle and are the results significant?
​​​​​​Also I noticed I was babysitting the grill a lot. On those longer cooks, especially on brisket, I was hoping the temperature would settle a bit more instead of having to adjust the vents all the time.
Would a slow n sear keep a much more stable temperature than charcoal piled to one side? I had unlit charcoal in a pile then poured about half a lit chimney of charcoal on top. I used lump charcoal.
Or would having briquettes steady the temperature a lot more than lump?
Finally, I was wondering if I should get a pit barrel cooker instead because it seems to get really good results with no baby sitting.
How would y'all compare the meat results from a weber kettle slow n sear with a pbc?
I know that pbc cooks at a higher temp and I would think it would lead to tougher meat than a kettle at around 225, but I've never tried a pbc. The testimonials in the pbc have all been good and the se for slow n sear so I have no idea which would be better for me.
I would like good tasting food and minimal vent adjusting, whether it be from stable temperature on the sns or set it and forget it from pbc.
For those of you who have tried the pbc, slow n sear, and weber kettle without slow n sear, what do you make of this or recommend?
There seem to be so many good options that I'm a bit paralyzed.








Comment