This is my third cook on my new PK Original. I’ve cooked many hundreds of times on my Weber Kettles so I am constantly comparing the two. Here’s a few initial thoughts.
Overall, a grill is a grill. Once you understand a few principle of thermodynamics, food science, etc. you can cook excellent food on almost any grill. So for me, it comes down to ease of setup, how easy is it to control the temperature, ease of moving from one zone to another, and the ease of cleanup. Also, there is the fun factor. Some frills are just more fun to cook on than others.
The PK Original is fun to cook on. Maybe it’s because it’s new to me, but I think it’s just a fun little grill.
I like the neat and tidy layout of the PK. An oblong zone for two zone cooking just makes sense to my brain, as does the vent layout. Open the vent under the coals and over the food. Nice movement of air.
It seems a bit sturdier than the Weber Kettles. Their wobbliness doesn’t bother me, but I like how sturdy the PK is.
I have not transported the PK, but I can’t figure out any way to haul it that is not more hassle and less secure than hauling my Webers. It looks like either I remove the capsule and figure out a way to secure the capsule, or use straps. The Webers are so easy. No straps needed. I can load a Weber Kettle in just a couple minutes with minimal hassle.
The Weber is more refined. A precision stamped steel unit will have better fit and finish than a semi-crudely cast aluminum. I don’t know that one is inherently better than the other. I am just noting the difference. This applies to the air control vents too.
The Weber grates are more solid than the stock PK grate. The PK grate is easy to bump out of place. Maybe the heaview SS grate would solve that.
The one place where the Weber shines and the PK flat out sucks is the ash management and containment system. I see it building up in the bottom of the PK. What do I do with it? It’s not that the PK is that bad, it’s just that the Weber is so advanced, it makes the PK look bad. If I ever drift away from the PK, it will be for the hassle of the ash management. Sure, I can buy an ash vacuum, but that’s a cost and hassle I’d like to avoid.
Overall, three cooks in, I like the PK a lot, but I don’t see it replacing my Webers. I think it will be a handy, fun addition to my setup.
Am I missing anything?
Overall, a grill is a grill. Once you understand a few principle of thermodynamics, food science, etc. you can cook excellent food on almost any grill. So for me, it comes down to ease of setup, how easy is it to control the temperature, ease of moving from one zone to another, and the ease of cleanup. Also, there is the fun factor. Some frills are just more fun to cook on than others.
The PK Original is fun to cook on. Maybe it’s because it’s new to me, but I think it’s just a fun little grill.
I like the neat and tidy layout of the PK. An oblong zone for two zone cooking just makes sense to my brain, as does the vent layout. Open the vent under the coals and over the food. Nice movement of air.
It seems a bit sturdier than the Weber Kettles. Their wobbliness doesn’t bother me, but I like how sturdy the PK is.
I have not transported the PK, but I can’t figure out any way to haul it that is not more hassle and less secure than hauling my Webers. It looks like either I remove the capsule and figure out a way to secure the capsule, or use straps. The Webers are so easy. No straps needed. I can load a Weber Kettle in just a couple minutes with minimal hassle.
The Weber is more refined. A precision stamped steel unit will have better fit and finish than a semi-crudely cast aluminum. I don’t know that one is inherently better than the other. I am just noting the difference. This applies to the air control vents too.
The Weber grates are more solid than the stock PK grate. The PK grate is easy to bump out of place. Maybe the heaview SS grate would solve that.
The one place where the Weber shines and the PK flat out sucks is the ash management and containment system. I see it building up in the bottom of the PK. What do I do with it? It’s not that the PK is that bad, it’s just that the Weber is so advanced, it makes the PK look bad. If I ever drift away from the PK, it will be for the hassle of the ash management. Sure, I can buy an ash vacuum, but that’s a cost and hassle I’d like to avoid.
Overall, three cooks in, I like the PK a lot, but I don’t see it replacing my Webers. I think it will be a handy, fun addition to my setup.
Am I missing anything?
Comment