What an amazing time we live in. Experienced amateurs with nothing more than careful use of a cell phone and some basic video editing software can produce high-resolution videos that can really help us, the watchers, up our BBQ game. I know for myself, I learn by watching. I learn by mimicking. So the plethora of high quality content on YouTube has been be awesome to witness.
Yet, there are at least two things that drive me crazy that a lot of YouTubers fall into. The first is one anyone who has done extensive research on grill reviews has encountered: the unboxing and assembly video. Now, there is nothing inherently wrong with such videos.
The concept is great and I find them valuable -- you can see how a grill is packaged and for someone with as little spatial visualization as myself, the assembly walk-throughs are extremely valuable. My problem is that with so many of these, the YouTuber ends the video extolling how great the grill is, how wonderful it is, how it will be the next best thing......without having grilled or smoked anything on it! That drives me crazy.
The next thing is a bit more subtle. The problem is not that it happens, but in how the YouTuber handles it.
If you follow someone whose channel has taken off, it seems you'll eventually see a video in which the YouTuber is praising a never-before-seen product or purchasable food item. The product/item is featured heavily in the video (often eclipsing the food being cooked) and the YouTuber insists that everyone needs to try it or incorporate it regularly into their repertoire. Then, it is never seen again on the channel. Ever.
We know what that is. That is a trial sponsorship. I wish YouTubers were more upfront about this. (It may very well be that they can't; that the agreement with the sponsor may be that it can't be mentioned as a sponsorship.) It's not dishonest and I have yet to see a video in which I think a YouTuber is misrepresenting a featured product, but it just seems almost jarring.
(Of course, there is nothing wrong with sponsorships. If your YouTube channel starts to take off, you probably should look into getting sponsorships as a form of "insurance." The Algorithm of YouTube is fickle and if you put out one under-performing video your monetization from YouTube alone could vanish.)
And while I am yammering on about this, relatedly, the other thing that is starting to get weird is with some of the big names is that the sponsorships are starting to get in the way a bit. For example, I'm sure that I am not the one who started to feel that some of Malcom Reed's videos a few months ago were inching close to being Traeger infomercials. (It was all Traeger all the time for a bit there.)
I think content creators are still trying to find that balance between "I'm making money because you are watching my videos" and "I am making money because you are making my sponsors money."
(And this is what happens when I write posts after three cups of coffee......)
Yet, there are at least two things that drive me crazy that a lot of YouTubers fall into. The first is one anyone who has done extensive research on grill reviews has encountered: the unboxing and assembly video. Now, there is nothing inherently wrong with such videos.
The concept is great and I find them valuable -- you can see how a grill is packaged and for someone with as little spatial visualization as myself, the assembly walk-throughs are extremely valuable. My problem is that with so many of these, the YouTuber ends the video extolling how great the grill is, how wonderful it is, how it will be the next best thing......without having grilled or smoked anything on it! That drives me crazy.
The next thing is a bit more subtle. The problem is not that it happens, but in how the YouTuber handles it.
If you follow someone whose channel has taken off, it seems you'll eventually see a video in which the YouTuber is praising a never-before-seen product or purchasable food item. The product/item is featured heavily in the video (often eclipsing the food being cooked) and the YouTuber insists that everyone needs to try it or incorporate it regularly into their repertoire. Then, it is never seen again on the channel. Ever.
We know what that is. That is a trial sponsorship. I wish YouTubers were more upfront about this. (It may very well be that they can't; that the agreement with the sponsor may be that it can't be mentioned as a sponsorship.) It's not dishonest and I have yet to see a video in which I think a YouTuber is misrepresenting a featured product, but it just seems almost jarring.
(Of course, there is nothing wrong with sponsorships. If your YouTube channel starts to take off, you probably should look into getting sponsorships as a form of "insurance." The Algorithm of YouTube is fickle and if you put out one under-performing video your monetization from YouTube alone could vanish.)
And while I am yammering on about this, relatedly, the other thing that is starting to get weird is with some of the big names is that the sponsorships are starting to get in the way a bit. For example, I'm sure that I am not the one who started to feel that some of Malcom Reed's videos a few months ago were inching close to being Traeger infomercials. (It was all Traeger all the time for a bit there.)
I think content creators are still trying to find that balance between "I'm making money because you are watching my videos" and "I am making money because you are making my sponsors money."
(And this is what happens when I write posts after three cups of coffee......)
Comment