New guy here! I already post my first question, now I gotta' start at the beginning. Which kind of explains this post.
I guess I should confess right off the bat about my choice of grills. What I'm now certain of is that I really should have started with a Weber Kettle. The Original Premium 22 inch. But, what I did buy instead was the Char-Broil 580. What can I tell you? I think it was the fact that the adjustable coal bed height seemed so. . . Sexy! Doesn't mater, that's what I got.
Well, it may turn out all right, even though I'm plotting to make another purchase in the near future. I thought it would be easy to make it do the 2 stage cooking that I've been reading about (yes Meathead, I got your book!) But I really should have gone with the next size up, the 780. (Sq. In of cooking surface.)
It is something of a miser when it comes to the amount of charcoal needed. Once I realized that was a selling point , I was able to get an honest 40 minutes and more, of indirect heat out of the thing, but for the second stage, the sear, I'll likely have to add some more brickets. But what made this possible was I only used one half of a chimney full of charcoal. I'd previously tried filling it up, but couldn't get the temp under control, no matter what combination I tried with the dampers.
OK, as usual, I think I'm headed towards explaining this to death! Bad habit I picked up somewhere along the way. Once I can collect my thoughts, I'll be back!
Mike S.
Spring Hill, FL
I guess I should confess right off the bat about my choice of grills. What I'm now certain of is that I really should have started with a Weber Kettle. The Original Premium 22 inch. But, what I did buy instead was the Char-Broil 580. What can I tell you? I think it was the fact that the adjustable coal bed height seemed so. . . Sexy! Doesn't mater, that's what I got.
Well, it may turn out all right, even though I'm plotting to make another purchase in the near future. I thought it would be easy to make it do the 2 stage cooking that I've been reading about (yes Meathead, I got your book!) But I really should have gone with the next size up, the 780. (Sq. In of cooking surface.)
It is something of a miser when it comes to the amount of charcoal needed. Once I realized that was a selling point , I was able to get an honest 40 minutes and more, of indirect heat out of the thing, but for the second stage, the sear, I'll likely have to add some more brickets. But what made this possible was I only used one half of a chimney full of charcoal. I'd previously tried filling it up, but couldn't get the temp under control, no matter what combination I tried with the dampers.
OK, as usual, I think I'm headed towards explaining this to death! Bad habit I picked up somewhere along the way. Once I can collect my thoughts, I'll be back!
Mike S.
Spring Hill, FL
Comment