We were talking about this in a different topic, and I wanted to split it off to keep them separate.
I’m curious why folks are down on the TempSpike. Up front: I don’t like it, either.
But I just tested it against my ChefAlarm. And they are both spot on. Water boils at 208.83° at my elevation; TempSpike read 209°, ChefAlarm read 208.9°. So the reasons I don’t like it have a lot more to do with not liking the app than not liking the thermometer itself. That, plus I have one working TempSpike and one dead TempSpike; but again, I only paid for one of them. But also, 50% failure rate. Small sample, but 50%.
As far as the ambient temperature reading, on a wireless insert thermometer that will be accurate, but not necessarily useful, regardless of the manufacturer. FireBoard warns about this in their documentation that accompanies the Pulse: “Lab testing shows that the external sensor’s readings vary from ambient grill temperatures by 10-30°F, depending on insertion depth.” They call it the “heat sink” effect; I’ve also seen it called a “meat shadow”. Basically, the temperature is lower near the cold meat. Huh. Go figure. So having an ambient reading is a feature that doesn’t help, and actually causes confusion.
So I’m going to keep mine. It should be useful for sous vide and rotisserie cooking, as long as it keeps working.
I’m curious why folks are down on the TempSpike. Up front: I don’t like it, either.
But I just tested it against my ChefAlarm. And they are both spot on. Water boils at 208.83° at my elevation; TempSpike read 209°, ChefAlarm read 208.9°. So the reasons I don’t like it have a lot more to do with not liking the app than not liking the thermometer itself. That, plus I have one working TempSpike and one dead TempSpike; but again, I only paid for one of them. But also, 50% failure rate. Small sample, but 50%.
As far as the ambient temperature reading, on a wireless insert thermometer that will be accurate, but not necessarily useful, regardless of the manufacturer. FireBoard warns about this in their documentation that accompanies the Pulse: “Lab testing shows that the external sensor’s readings vary from ambient grill temperatures by 10-30°F, depending on insertion depth.” They call it the “heat sink” effect; I’ve also seen it called a “meat shadow”. Basically, the temperature is lower near the cold meat. Huh. Go figure. So having an ambient reading is a feature that doesn’t help, and actually causes confusion.
So I’m going to keep mine. It should be useful for sous vide and rotisserie cooking, as long as it keeps working.










Comment