Troutman what was your method of lightning and arranging the coals in your wsm?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
QVQ Medium Rare Brisket - Step by Step
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Club Member
- Jan 2017
- 130
- Lubbock, TX
-
Deep in the MCS zone.
Currently have
Gas: Weber Genesis 330
Charcoal: Weber 22 Premium
Smoker: PBC
Toys: DigiQ, Thermapen thermometer, Lodge Griddle/Grill
Looking to acquire: SNS, and one of everything else
Well I'm a bit late posting, but I tried this last week. Here is what I came up with.
Dry brined overnight and placed in PBC the next evening. This was a prime whole packer I had picked up from Sam's Club. Not very big for a whole packer...around 13.5lb post trimming. Rubbed generously with black pepper.
Set back and have a margarita...critical step. Do not skip the drink.
Cooked around 2hrs and hit around 125 internal so I pulled it, stuck it in a vacuum seal bag and into the water bath. As you can see below I didn't have much color at this point. Maybe should have added more wood since the PBC usually depends on drippings for smoke and with this only going to 125 I didn't have a lot of juice flowing yet. Anyone else tried or noticed this?
Into the water bath it went for approximately 60hrs. (And thanks to the forum for suggesting the Coleman Party Stacker as a container for the cook. Worked like a champ.)
I know they said 50 was enough, but I wasn't getting up at midnight to do the second smoke. I added some more seasoning as I had rubbed off a lot of the pepper in the bag. I also added some Chupacabra brisket magic rub Second smoke was again around 2hrs...I might or might not have accidentally left the lid on the PBC cracked and let the temperature get to 400 at one point.... Final result.
Very good. Flat was moist and very tender. Texture was closer to a steak than what I normally associate with brisket but was far from the dried stuff that is only good for chopping up I usually get on thin flats. Point was also excellent but the level of smoke was lighter than usual and again texture was slightly different. Not steak like, but not the same as a fully smoked brisket. For me, I think i will separate them next time. I really liked the juicy flat better than anything I normally get, but the point... It was good, but I think I prefer the burnt ends style with a long smoke. I can't even really explain what was off other than my wife an I both agreed it wasn't quite right. I will definitely keep playing with this. Out of curiosity has anyone tried the recipe Clint has on the free side. He did 155 for shorter time and did SVQ instead of the QVQ. Just curious what others thought of it.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Club Member
- Aug 2017
- 9998
- Hate Less, Cook More
-
OUTDOOR COOKERS
BBQ ACCESSORIES
WOOD & PELLET PREFERENCES
SOUS VIDE
INDOOR COOKWARE
Excellent job my friend!! It is a departure from low and slow brisket. Next time I’d suggest just doing a flat, you seemed happy with that result.
As to Clint’s SVQ, the Pit has jointly gone beyond his and others like his to develop the QVQ alternative. We feel it’s superior in that your first pre-Smoke is key to getting a better finish. Meat, when cold and damp, takes on the most Smokey flavor. Once pre-smoked, you’re ready for the bath. Post smoke simply resets the bark and reheats the meat for service.
His lacks that critical first step, otherwise it’s basically the same thing.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
That looks great I can't wait to try it.But I was thinking of using the flat as that tends to dry out sometimes.Last edited by brew7353; July 24, 2019, 05:28 AM.
Comment
-
Just had to comment on what an eye opening thread this has been. On the 3rd I dry brined a brisket flat I had purchased from Porter Road. On the 4th I rubbed it with Hank’s Beef rub and smoked it to 150F. Then put it in the bath double sealed at 155F for several day until pulling it before Saturday dinner so it could spend more time in the smoker.
It was a hands down winner. Moist, flavorful, and tender with just the right tug. No stressing if I would be ready for dinner time and I got to spend all day with my guests without worrying about what was going on with the smoker. As a bonus I kept using the sous vide bath to reheat bags of pulled pork I had prepared on the 4th for other meals over the weekend.
This is going to be my standard preparation when I have a lot of guests over for a weekend. Hats off to you Troutman for bringing this subject to our attention and providing clear instructions.
- Likes 8
Comment
-
Also want to give a shout out to texastweeter . Did those Cowboy beans per your instructions and they were outstanding. They are going to be a staple around here from now on.🙂
- 1 like
-
Donw well thankya! Glad you enjoyed em. I sure do!
-
Picked up a flat to finally try this technique. I salted for an hour then cross hatched and rubbed with bbbr. Smoked on the pk360 for about 2 hours until around 120 internal temp. Then i slid it over the coals for a few minutes. The process reminds me of chefsteps and Dave Arnold's pre-searing technique for sous vide steaks. Basically to develop crust/bark no matter the heat level it still takes time to build the maillard reaction crust/bark. So the more times you can expose you meat to the process without over doing it the better the outside will be. Refreshing a sear or simply doing a half sear to build on your final sear is about the same as QVQ. I've also heard enough debate about pre vs post smoke to see the genius in doing both. Got it in the bath for the 54 or so hours can't wait to see how the final step goes. 👍ðŸ–Last edited by Michael Brinton; July 25, 2019, 07:06 PM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
All in all it came out well. 225 was to low for bark development. Next time i would definitely start at least 275-300 +. I over shot the final temp attempting to get the bark set. The brisket available to me locally would probably benefit from 72 hours cooking. I'm planning to do this again soon adjusting those factors. Everyone at dinner thought it was great.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Club Member
- May 2019
- 147
- Surprise, AZ
-
Mike O'
RecTec Stampede w/ Grill Grates
Makers Mark on ice with a dribble of water.
OK, here's my question. Why put it in the smoker for two hours first? I've been cooking sous vide for a number of years, albeit only steaks and fish and veggies, but I've never pre seared any of it because invariably, whatever is in the bag is soaking in fluid by the time it's taken out of the bath. I would think that it would be very detrimental to whatever bark had formed during the initial smoke. Has anyone tried first cooking it sous vide for 48 hours at maybe 120°, then putting it in the smoker either low and slow or hot and fast until the desired internal temp?
Comment
-
The first Q is just for smoke, not really bark. The "V" (SV) step then takes care of the collagen conversion and tenderness. The second Q gives you the bark and additional smoke.
Smoke sticks to cold and wet and you get to do that twice with QVQ.
- 3 likes
-
+1 on what Polarbear777 said.
From what I learned at a recent SV Summit...
- A SV pre-sear adds flavor, it’s not for bark.
- 120 is too low for long cooks because there’s too much of a chance for bacterial growth. I believe CREA recommends 127 as a minimum and our fearless leader, Meathead, recommends 131.
- An ice bath and chill is recommended after SV long cooks. It helps in developing additional flavor.
- 2 likes
-
Club Member
- May 2019
- 147
- Surprise, AZ
-
Mike O'
RecTec Stampede w/ Grill Grates
Makers Mark on ice with a dribble of water.
Polarbear777 T-bone,or Troutman Thank you all for your answers. I get it now. I'm absolutely going to try the QVQ method cause I've got lots of time on my hands. On a side note, AmazingRibs.com is astounding for the aggregation of BBQ knowledge that resides on this site. Thank you Meathead for coming up with the idea, and thank you to all active participants who willingly share your knowledge with newbies like me. You're an invaluable resource for folks that love BBQ.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Very interesting technique. For the Michigan v MSU game my plan was to take Friday off and smoke the 13# prime packer I've got in the freezer. Then, chop shred after cambro (I'll cube some of the flat, freeze it and use it 2 weeks later in chili for the OSU game) and mix with some sauce, peppers, mushrooms and onions and set in the 'fridge overnight. Then, with it tightly covered I just need to warm it during the tailgate for brisket sandwiches. But, I also really like the idea of finishing it in the smoker at the tailgate and this QVQ method would work great for that.
These kinds of decisions are so difficult.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I have a packer that has had steps 1 and 2 done (bath at 131) in my fridge. How best would I do step 3 if I want to pull it rather than slice it?
Comment
-
I've never pulled medium rare brisket, the idea is to have and slice it like steak. But if you insist I would treat it like a regular brisket cook at this point and get it probe tender. I really would re-think that however, starting at 131* you really need to end there. Plenty of regular SVQ recipes for pulled brisket.
-
I would have Sous vided hotter. Like 155 or so.
Longer SV than 72 hours, never seen that, so dunno if that will result in pullable. So maybe it’s just smoke it hot to probe tender.
-
Chuck is pullable at 72+ hours at 135F.
I’ve not tried brisket beyond 72 hours but still sliceable at that point.
Longer may result in undesirable enzymatic changes (falls to pieces not gracefully). Probably could go a bit hotter and get it pullable.
You can always "pull" what you are able to, put the chunks in a Dutch oven with all the juices and braise in the oven covered until it’s tender enough to completely shred.
-
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comment