So, I'm doing Pulled Pork for Memorial Day, and I had a 4.5 lb Blade Roast and a 2.5 butt in the freezer, and decided to do both - together. There's gotta be a difference in the cook time for a bone-in roast than for the boneless, both done at 225-250. Any thoughts when cooking them together? I'm thinking the bone-in goes on first...butt not sure.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A minor (I hope) Smoking Dilemma...
Collapse
X
-
Founding Member
- Jul 2014
- 851
- Las Vegas, NV
-
CharGriller Pro COS
Oklahoma Joe COS
Maverick 732 thermometer
Red Thermapen
Favorite beer: Scotch
I know I make damn good BBQ cause my 3 dogs have NEVER said no to it. (OTOH, my 13yr old says no to just about everything, except my ribs.)
I would also think the bone-in would go in first, but not by much. The more important factor is probably the thickness of the meat itself. I'm guessing they are pretty similar in that regard. Even if one finishes earlier than the other you can always hold them in a faux cambro. Pork forgiving enough that it won't matter if it is an extra hour or two for that, just that more tender.
-
Charter Member
- Dec 2014
- 7380
- Grew up in New Orleans, 20 years in Texas, 22 years in Mandeville, LA. Now Dallas, TX
The thickness of the meat determines cook time. If they are similar thickness they should finish about the same time. Use thickness for your guesstimate as to when to put them on.
Comment
-
Club Member
- Nov 2015
- 1409
- Schertz Texas
-
Pit Barrel Cooker
Slow 'n Sear for 22" Kettle
Weber 22" Kettle (Craiglist)
Slow 'n Sear for 22" Kettle
Weber Rapid Fire Chimney
Maverick ET-732
Kingsford Original Charcoal
Kingsford Competition Charcoal
Anova Sous Vide
I'd say put them in together. The faux cambro is a great equalizer. Even if it is a hour earlier on one you can have them the FC for 4 hours.
Comment
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comment