Why? I've seen a few posts on trying to tune the PBC for specific cooks, specifically trying to tone down the temp to 225. Has anyone done a side by side comparison? I'm skeptical that it makes a difference, other than taking longer.
To start the test, I really 'robustly' (read: abusively) cooked some ribs. Other than making sure the PBC was well lit, I didn't fiddle. Infact, I deliberately ran hot - started at 400 and staying above 310 for most of the cook. Just to see if it ruined the ribs.
Here are the finished ribs. Took about 3 hours, no wrap, no sauce. (two different rubs were used).
Considering how easy they were, and obviously how well they turned out (bone demonstrates the clean finish, lower rib shows that the meat is still clinging for the satisfying 'tug'), does the extra time / fiddling reap any meaningful rewards?
Matt
To start the test, I really 'robustly' (read: abusively) cooked some ribs. Other than making sure the PBC was well lit, I didn't fiddle. Infact, I deliberately ran hot - started at 400 and staying above 310 for most of the cook. Just to see if it ruined the ribs.
Here are the finished ribs. Took about 3 hours, no wrap, no sauce. (two different rubs were used).
Considering how easy they were, and obviously how well they turned out (bone demonstrates the clean finish, lower rib shows that the meat is still clinging for the satisfying 'tug'), does the extra time / fiddling reap any meaningful rewards?
Matt
Comment