I posted this on the public SNS page. Re-posting here for fellow Pit members to chime-in.
Water with Reverse Sear?
Gents,
I just placed an order for the SNS after using the Smokenator for 2+ years. I have a question on how to best reverse-sear ribeyes. For some background: on the Smokenator, I use a small bread-pan (same as what comes with the Smokenator, but smaller) filled with water during the low 'n' slow (LnS) portion of the cook. When it comes time to sear, I remove both the water-pan and Smokenator, put on some GrillGrates, and go Warp 10.
First thought and question: I've read that the slower the cook, the more tender the flesh. This is why I use the water-pan, to keep the LnS at around 225 for the entire duration of getting to 115 degrees, with the idea that this may contribute to more tender meat relative to what I'd get if I went without the water pan, which gets me around 300 degrees and of course a shorter/faster LnS cook time. So is this thinking correct? I would love it if you guys could do more thorough tests on this hypothesis: how much more tender is a ribeye cooked up to 115 degrees internal temp at 225 degrees vs 300 degrees[1].
If longer/slower cook times do indeed result in more tender flesh, then I would continue to use water for a reverse-sear ribeye cook using the SNS to extend out the LnS cook time. I guess I'll find some sort of syphon pump to suck out the water before starting the sear.
[1] perhaps you guys can do a Kickstarter for these types of research projects?
Water with Reverse Sear?
Gents,
I just placed an order for the SNS after using the Smokenator for 2+ years. I have a question on how to best reverse-sear ribeyes. For some background: on the Smokenator, I use a small bread-pan (same as what comes with the Smokenator, but smaller) filled with water during the low 'n' slow (LnS) portion of the cook. When it comes time to sear, I remove both the water-pan and Smokenator, put on some GrillGrates, and go Warp 10.
First thought and question: I've read that the slower the cook, the more tender the flesh. This is why I use the water-pan, to keep the LnS at around 225 for the entire duration of getting to 115 degrees, with the idea that this may contribute to more tender meat relative to what I'd get if I went without the water pan, which gets me around 300 degrees and of course a shorter/faster LnS cook time. So is this thinking correct? I would love it if you guys could do more thorough tests on this hypothesis: how much more tender is a ribeye cooked up to 115 degrees internal temp at 225 degrees vs 300 degrees[1].
If longer/slower cook times do indeed result in more tender flesh, then I would continue to use water for a reverse-sear ribeye cook using the SNS to extend out the LnS cook time. I guess I'll find some sort of syphon pump to suck out the water before starting the sear.
[1] perhaps you guys can do a Kickstarter for these types of research projects?
Comment